|
Current News
McVeigh wasn't given key facts
Letter to Ashcroft alleging testimony by lab witness was false didn't reach defense.
By John Solomon
The Associated Press
May 1, 2003
WASHINGTON -- Ten days before Timothy McVeigh was executed, lawyers for FBI lab employees
sent an urgent letter to the attention of Attorney General John Ashcroft alleging that a key prosecution witness in the Oklahoma
City bombing trial might have given false testimony about forensic evidence.
The allegations involving Stephen Burmeister, now the FBI lab's chief of scientific analysis,
were never turned over to McVeigh, though they surfaced as a judge was weighing whether to delay his execution because the
government withheld evidence.
The letter was recently given to bombing conspirator Terry Nichols, who faces another trial
on Oklahoma state murder charges.
"Material evidence presented by the government in the OKBOMB prosecution through the testimony
of Mr. Burmeister appears to be false, misleading and potentially fabricated," said the June 1, 2001, letter to Ashcroft obtained
by The Associated Press.
The letter cited Burmeister's testimony in a civil case as evidence contradicting his earlier
McVeigh testimony. It was sent to Ashcroft's general fax number and by courier with the notation "URGENT MATTER FOR THE IMMEDIATE
ATTENTION OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL."
Justice officials said Wednesday the letter was routed to Ashcroft's clerical office in
the Maryland suburbs of Washington, where it sat for nearly two months and then was forwarded to the FBI -- well after McVeigh
was executed on June 11, 2001, at the federal penitentiary near Terre Haute, Ind.
Neither Ashcroft nor other top officials in the Justice Department who handled the McVeigh
case saw it, spokeswoman Barbara Comstock said. It was never reviewed to determine if it should be handed over to McVeigh's
lawyers, officials said.
Prosecutors are obligated by law to disclose any potentially exculpatory evidence to the
defense.
McVeigh's lawyers expressed dismay at the revelation. At the time the letter was sent, a
judge had delayed McVeigh's execution by a month because of other evidence the FBI failed to turn over.
"It is truly shocking and just the latest revelation of government conduct that bankrupts
the prosecution, investigation and verdict," said Stephen Jones, McVeigh's lead trial attorney.
Title: District judge steps down from Nichols' case Source:
Daily Oklahoman URL Source: http://www.newsok.com/cgi-bin/show_article?ID=951096&pic=none&TP=getcc Published: Nov 23, 2002 Author: Nolan Clay
The case against Terry Nichols was thrown back into limbo Friday when his judge withdrew
from overseeing the preliminary hearing.
District Judge Ray Dean Linder stepped down after 27 months on the case.
"I think I've expended all the effort I can," said Linder, 67, of Alva. "I am very,
very relieved."
The preliminary hearing is set to begin Feb. 3 but the judge's departure means another
delay is likely.
First, a new judge willing to take the case will have to be found by the state Supreme
Court's chief justice.
The next judge will need time to catch up on the legal issues that must be resolved
before testimony can begin.
Prosecutor Lou Keel put off plans to subpoena witnesses after Linder's surprise announcement.
Nichols, 47, was convicted at a federal trial of the conspiracy to bomb the Oklahoma
City federal building and the involuntary manslaughter of eight federal agents.
His state case is over the 160 others who died as a result of the 1995 attack.
Linder was not specific about his reasons in his public comments in court and afterward
with reporters.
However, he told a prosecutor and defense attorney privately that he was stepping
down in part because of his wife's knee-replacement surgery.
He told reporters, "I had just gotten worn to the point that I was afraid I would
make a mistake that would jeopardize one side or the other's right to a fair resolution."
He also noted that he is the presiding judge of 19 counties and people with cases
there "deserve attention, too."
Linder took over after the first judge assigned to the preliminary hearing was disqualified
for ethical reasons.
One of Linder's first decisions was to remove Bob Macy, then the district attorney,
from the case for prejudicial remarks.
In another key decision, he later refused to dismiss Nichols' case on "double-jeopardy"
grounds.
Nichols had argued he could not be tried in state court because of his federal conviction.
Linder's announcement upset victims and prosecutors who have grown weary of the delays.
"How can he do this?" widow Diane Leonard asked afterward.
In a statement, District Attorney Wes Lane said, "Whereas I have the upmost respect
for Judge Linder, I wish we would have known this a year ago. ... This case has taken far too long to get to a preliminary
hearing."
Lane also said, "I hope that a new judge will be appointed quickly so that we can
have a preliminary hearing as soon as possible."
At a preliminary hearing, a judge decides whether prosecutors have enough evidence
for trial.
In his final act, Linder approved $134,287 in defense bills.
The judge ruled lead defense attorney Brian Hermanson will be paid $185 an hour for
his time and overhead.
Supreme Court jump starts Nichols case 2002-10-28 Nolan Clay The Oklahoman
The state Supreme Court
on Monday cleared the way for the case against Terry Nichols to continue by resolving a dispute over defense funding. "What
this means is that we should see this case getting back on track," Oklahoma County District Attorney Wes Lane said.
Justices
- in a two-page ruling - put Terry Nichols' preliminary hearing judge in charge of overseeing defense expenses.
Justices
also required defense bills to be submitted "in sufficient detail" to allow Judge Ray Dean Linder to determine whether they
are reasonable.
Nichols, 47, was convicted at a federal trial of conspiracy to bomb the Oklahoma City federal building
and the involuntary manslaughter of eight federal agents. His state case is over the 160 others who died as a result of the
1995 attack.
Justices had ruled on the funding dispute July 2, but stepped in again because Nichols' attorneys were
at odds with Oklahoma County's presiding judge, Dan Owens.
Defense attorneys had called Owens "hostile" to funding
Nichols' case. Owens, in turn, complained the defense bills were too vague to pay.
The decision Monday takes away
Owens' oversight of the defense bills. Justices did not explain their reasoning for the switch.
Defense attorneys
have spent $1.7 million so far.
Linder will stay in control of the defense bills until after the preliminary hearing.
Responsibility will then go to the judge in charge of the trial.
Defense bills are paid out of the Oklahoma County
court fund - a collection of fines, fees and forfeitures in civil, traffic and criminal cases.
Nichols' lawyer warned on funds 2002-08-24 By Nolan Clay The Oklahoman
Terry Nichols' lead attorney
was warned by a judge in July that payment of future defense expenses "could not be guaranteed" because of the state's financial
problems. A written account of attorney Brian Hermanson's meeting with Oklahoma County's presiding judge was made public
Friday.
Judge Dan Owens, who oversees defense expenses, told the defense attorney July 23 "that the statewide budget
for the Judiciary was unsettled and that payment could not be guaranteed."
At issue is how much money will be available
for the defense from the Oklahoma County court fund.
Defense expenses have been paid out of the court fund, a collection
of fees and fines in civil, traffic and criminal cases.
But the money, combined with funding provided by the Legislature,
helps pay salaries of judges across the state. The judiciary could need more help from the court fund if less taxpayer funding
is available later this year because of the state's economic problems.
"That's why we're worried," Owens said Friday.
Nichols, 47, is facing a state murder trial over the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. His attorneys have spent $1.7 million
so far but have not been paid in months after running out of most of their funds.
The attorneys won approval in July,
however, to seek more money when the state Supreme Court threw out a contract limiting them to $1.8 million.
Hermanson
plans to complain again to the Supreme Court next week. The document filed Friday reveals the lead attorney and presiding
judge are at odds on at least three key issues:
Hermanson wants to be paid $185 an hour for salary and overhead. The
judge said the Supreme Court directed him to follow a legal precedent that requires defense fees to be "based upon the salary
of the district attorney and average overhead."
Hermanson said he needs a new contract so he can recruit help. He
has lost all his defense investigators, and three of the attorneys hired for the case have other full-time jobs.
"Without
having parameters in writing, I don't think I can hire anyone," Hermanson told Owens.
The judge said the legal precedent
does not direct the court to provide a contract, letter or other written document.
Hermanson said he has in the past
submitted bills for payment twice monthly. The judge plans to review bills only four times a year.
The funding dispute
is the latest problem in a case that hasn't even come to preliminary hearing.
Nichols has been in the Oklahoma County
jail since Jan. 31, 2000.
Another status hearing is set for Wednesday.
Nichols was convicted at his 1997 federal
trial of plotting to blow up the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building and of the involuntary manslaughter of eight federal agents.
He was sentenced in his federal case to life in prison.
We found this and thought it was very interesting to say the least. The person who compiled this photo had this to say
about it:
In this jpg file I altered Jose Padilla's hairline a tiny bit just to see what he would look like and I put
two small lines under the eyes of John Doe #2. Everything else is exactly as the originals. I've put circles around the scars
to point them out. We have verified by examining originals of these photos that he didnt add the apparent
marks on the left cheek of each image. But we're sure theyre just another coincidence.

|
| NOTE : THE SCAR |
Look at the picture of the OKC bombing suspects. The one on the right
was Tim McVeigh - John Doe #1, the one on the left was John Doe #2. Then look at the picture of Jose Padilla, who recently
was taken into custody as a "enemy combatant" for allegedly planning to use a 'dirty bomb' (Jose Padilla - a Brooklyn- born
Muslim convert who adopted the name Abdullah al Muhajir). Does Padilla and John Doe #2 look like the same person? What
do you think?
Click the link below for more information.
June 17, 2002 AFTERMATH OF TERROR
Conspiracy Buffs See Similarities Between Jose Padilla, John Doe 2
By JAY KRALL and JONATHAN EIG Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
Lincoln had a secretary
named Kennedy, Kennedy had a secretary named Lincoln, and Terry Lynn Nichols had a wife named Padilla.
The latter
bit of news has put conspiracy theorists on heightened alert.
For years, a small, devoted group has been trying to
prove that the nation's second-deadliest terrorist attack -- on the Alfred P. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City -- was carried
out not just by Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols but also by a vast network of Muslim extremists.
Such claims won
little attention, and even ardent advocates say they had all but given up the cause. But when Jose Padilla was accused of
plotting to detonate a so-called dirty bomb and his photo appeared in newspapers and on television, members of a hard-core
group of conspiracy theorists did double-takes.
"I thought, boy, he looks a lot like the John Doe
2 sketches," said Charles Key, a former state representative from Oklahoma who leads a private group called the Oklahoma Bombing
Investigation Committee.
The FBI, which isn't taking these claims seriously, now says that John Doe 2 probably never
existed. But he was once a prime suspect in the April 19, 1995, bombing when a Ryder truck filled with nearly 5,000 pounds
of fertilizer and fuel oil blew up, killing 168 people.
Witnesses at the time said they remembered seeing two men
at the Ryder truck-rental outlet in Junction City, Kan., where investigators traced the rented vehicle. Two men were also
reportedly seen eating at a Denny's restaurant in Junction City five days before the attack. One of the men is believed to
have been Mr. McVeigh. The other was never identified and never found.
John Doe 2 was the subject of an intensive
manhunt. Authorities offered a $2 million reward on his head. The FBI described him as a white male in his late 20s or early
30s, about 5-foot-9 or 5-foot-10. His sketch, released by the FBI the day after the bombing, shows dark hair swept straight
back, strong eyebrows, a square jaw and a powerful neck. Mr. Padilla, who is Hispanic, appears to have a more rounded jaw,
but his other features closely match those of the sketch.
FBI sketch of John Doe 2 (top); Jose Padilla
Still,
FBI officials dismiss talk of any likeness. "We couldn't find any evidence to indicate there was a John Doe 2 despite what
people were saying," said one FBI official. As for the Padilla link, he said, "You're kidding, right?"
Bryan Preston,
a writer and TV producer in Towson, Md., was watching a call-in news show last week when a caller mentioned a resemblance
between Mr. Padilla and John Doe 2. Mr. Preston dug up the old police sketch of John Doe 2 and posted it on his personal Web
site. "I've never bought into conspiracy theories," Mr. Preston says, "but I can't help but thinking maybe there's more to
the story here."
Since Mr. Padilla's arrest, others who suspect a connection have scoured the Internet, books about
the bombing and media reports about Mr. Padilla for clues linking him to the Oklahoma City bombing. For some, the fact that
Mr. Padilla, born in New York and raised in Chicago, appears to have been in the U.S. and out of jail at the time of the bombing
is enough cause for suspicion. Some say they just don't believe Messrs. McVeigh and Nichols acted alone.
Mr. Key says
members of his committee will soon begin asking witnesses who say they saw John Doe 2 to look at photos of Mr. Padilla. American
Politics Journal posted the sketch and photos of Padilla to their Web site without comment. A spokesman for the political
journal said the publication had no official position on the question, but placed the photos and sketches on their site for
readers to draw their own conclusions.
In Tampa, Fla., radio talk-show host Glenn Beck noted the resemblance on his
show last week and posted a story about it at his Web site asking listeners if they think Mr. Padilla could have been involved
with the Oklahoma City bombing. Almost 70% said yes.
Stephen R. Jones, Mr. McVeigh's attorney, has spoken often of
his attempts to prove his client was part of a broader conspiracy, although Mr. McVeigh himself denied it. While preparing
their case, members of Mr. Jones's team traveled several times to the Philippines, where Mr. Nichols had visited, to research
possible contacts he may have had with foreign terrorists, including associates of Osama bin Laden.
Mr. Jones says
his client didn't cooperate in that investigation but that Mr. McVeigh was so adamant in refusing to point fingers that it
raised Mr. Jones's suspicions. After his conviction, Mr. McVeigh reportedly told authors researching a book about the bombing
that he planted the explosives to teach the government a lesson. Mr. McVeigh, who was executed on June 11, 2001, never named
accomplices.
Then there's the detail that so tantalizes many conspiracy theorists: Lana Padilla is the former wife
of Mr. Nichols, charged as Mr. McVeigh's accomplice and sentenced to life in prison.
Ms. Padilla laughed when a local
television talk show called to ask her about the matching names. She says she's never met Jose Padilla and isn't related to
him.
But she, too, believes there was a larger conspiracy at work. After the bombing, she gave police a letter she
received in 1994 from Mr. Nichols before one of his trips to the Philippines. In the letter, she says, he suggested he was
"afraid of something or somebody." Ms. Padilla speculates he was worried he might be harmed if he identified his co-conspirators.
The more she looks at the mug shots, the more intrigued she becomes. "At first I found it funny," she says. "Now I
think we should investigate this."
-- Gary Fields contributed to this article.
Write to Jay Krall at jason.krall@wsj.com2
and Jonathan Eig at jonathan.eig@wsj.com3
Visit www.okcbombing.org for complete information
press release
John Michael Johnston
Attorney at Law
228 Robert S. Kerr Blvd. Suite 620, Courtplaza, Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma 73102 (405) 235-4074
PRESS RELEASE
Do Not Release Before
10 AM, Central 4-19-02
(Oklahoma City) Everyone knows what happened in Oklahoma City at the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building on April 19, 1995.
However, only a handful of people know that on that very day someone other than Tim McVeigh or Terry Nichols confessed to
being involved in the terrorist bombing plot that killed 168 people in Oklahoma City.
Abdul Hakim Murrad was a Federal prisoner at the Metropolitan
Correctional Center in New York City. He was awaiting trial for his part in a plot to blow up a dozen 747 airliners in the
South Pacific. He announced to his jailers, (and later told the FBI), the Oklahoma City bombing had been orchestrated by his
former roommate in the Philippines Ramsey Youssef. Youssef was the most wanted terrorist in the world until his capture in
Pakistan in February,1995. Ramsey Youssef had been the mastermind behind the first World Trade Center attack in January of
1993.
Why should Murrad be believed? For one thing,
Murrad made his confession voluntarily and spontaneously. Most important, Murrad tied Ramsey Youssef to the OKC bombing long
before Terry Nichols' was publicly identified as a suspect. How could Murrad have known that eventually Terry Nichols would
become a defendant? Or, for that matter, that Terry Nichols had recently spent a great deal of time in the Philippines, especially
Cebu City, during the precise times that Murrad and Youssef were also there. How could Murrad have known that Nichols phone
records would show 13 unidentified calls from Kansas to the Philippines during the period of early April 1995, in the days
prior to the Bombing?
On the 7th anniversary of the Oklahoma
City Bombing, a number of the victims of the Murrah Building tragedy wish to begin the process of informing the American people
of an ever growing mountain of evidence implicating the State of Iraq. This evidence will show that the Republic of Iraq and
Saddam Hussein were involved in funding and planning the Oklahoma City bombing.
Perhaps even more alarming is the realization
that certain elements of the United States government must have known about this foreign involvement all along. Indeed, in
a recent Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking to obtain relevant information concerning John Doe II and the OKC bombing,
Federal Judge Wayne Alley observed in written orders ( June/July 2001) that, The FBI had maintained a shroud of secrecy around
the entire bombing case since 1995. Ignoring substantial evidence of a major international terrorist offensive, conceived
and planned in the Philippines sometime between 1991 and 1994, which produced tragic consequences of its own.
In ignoring the Youssef inspired
plan, Code named Project Bojinka or Big Boom, the FBI created a situation that resulted in less than complete justice for
the victims of the OKC bombing.
Perhaps even more significant is the refusal to thoroughly investigate
evidence of foreign involvement in the Oklahoma City Bombing resulted in a failure to anticipate the eventual execution of
the most horrific part of the Project Bojinka plans. Specifically, other major terrorist acts were revealed on Ramsey Youssefs
lap top computer, which was seized by Philippine authorities in January 1995, as Abdul Hakim Murrad was arrested. The most
devastating of these new terrorist actions manifested itself on September 11, 2001, in New York City, Washington DC and the
countryside of western Pennsylvania at a cost of almost 4,000 American civilian dead.
(The preceding statement will be presented
at a press conference to be held by Mr. Johnston, several of the OKC bombing victims and others on April 19, 2002, at 10 AM
Central time. The event will be hosted at the Christ-Averting-His-Eyes memorial located on the corner of 5th and Harvey,
just west of the Federal bombing memorial site. The press conference will start 30 minutes after the conclusion of the memorial
service.)
|