Unless you're someone whose been following this sickening act of terrorism through independent media outlets, you haven't been told the truth by the government's media machine. The following is my report on the bombing. Please download it and give it to ten people and tell them to do the same thing. Like WACO, Ruby Ridge, TWA Flight 800, Pan Am Flight 103, America has been lied to and it's up to US to expose these liars who have made a mockery out of the words truth, justice and the American way.

One of the attorneys in Los Angeles representing the families suing the government for prior knowledge and wrongful death, read my report and said that it summed up the situation quite accurately and had raised questions even he had not thought of; I'll see what you think.

This article is not being presented as an effort to defend either Tim McVeigh, Terry Nichols or any other individuals. This article is a must to defend truth, accountability and the integrity of our nation. The corruption in Washington, DC is a cancer eating away at our great Republic and only by exposing the whole truth and bringing all those responsible to a court of law, will our nation heal.

We know that the building was bombed. The government maintains that it was a fertilizer bomb inside a Ryder truck parked in front of the building. Despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary, the government steadfastly maintains that it was a single bomb that did the horrific damage to the building. Is there anything to dispute this?

1 . The report by retired Brigadier General Benton K. Partin, a 31 year veteran of the U.S. Air Force and one of the premier experts on this subject. Ben served as Commander of the Air Force Armament Technology Lab, was the first Chairman of the Office of the Secretary of Defense Joint Service Air Munitions Requirements and Development Committee and was responsible for munitions development for the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines. He is a recognized expert as a major guiding force of our modern precision guided weapons systems. A real "right-wing, antigovernment wacko". Right. I can tell you one thing: my husband and 1 know Ben Partin and he is one of the most decent, intelligent human beings I've ever had the honor of knowing.

Ben's intense report, based on his years of experience, states emphatically that the building was brought down by a number of bombs placed at certain support columns inside the building and that the fertilizer bomb theory is utter nonsense. Taylor Jesse Clear, a former Special Advisor for Combating Terrorism at the Pentagon's Counter Terrorism Directorate, said General Partin's report is "the most convincing and sensible analysis of the event I've ever seen." A Sam Gronning, former military demolitionist and a professional blaster for the past 30 years, was quoted as saying that in his opinion, Gen. Partin's report was "absolutely right and that no truck bomb full of ANFO could cause the type of damage done to the Murrah Building." Were any of these highly qualified individuals allowed to testify at McVeigh's trial? No, they were barred. How come? Because they all anti-government, right-wing extremists?

In June of 1997, a statement was issued by Sam Cohen, renowned physicist who worked on the Manhattan Project, said the fertilizer truck bomb is a fairy tale. Of course, according to the government, Mr. Cohen must be just another antigovernment, right-wing extremist wacko. Is anyone starting to see a horrible pattern here?

Are there others like Gen. Partin and Sam Cohen? Alvin Norberg, whom 1 have spoken with, is a retired licensed professional engineer who lives in Northern California. His take on the fertilizer bomb bringing down that building? "...that the severe structural damage to the Murrah Building was not caused by a truck bomb outside the building and that the collapse of the building was the result of mechanically coupled devices (bombs) placed locally within the structure adjacent to the critical columns." I guess Mr. Norberg's 50 years of engineering experience doesn't qualify him to make an expert opinion.

Another individual with over 40 years experience as a practicing engineer in Texas, New Mexico and Louisiana, Robert Frias, President of Frias Engineering of Arlington, Texas, has this to say: "The Murrah Building would still be standing and the upper floors would be intact had the truck loaded with explosives been the only culprit....Expiosives had to have been placed near, or on, the structural columns inside the building to cause the collapse that occurred to the Murrah building." Is Mr. Frias another right-wing, loonbag, anti-government wacko?

Was it even ammonia nitrate found at the bomb site? 1 have the 450+ page report put out by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General on the FBI lab in Washington, DC. The only words to describe what is contained in the pages of this report is obscene. In Section G: Oklahoma City bombing, we find the following comments:

McVeigh has been sentenced to death for using an ANFO bomb. Strange thing, though, no ammonia nitrate was found at the site according to witnesses who were in a position to know. Of course, according to the government, the only eyewitnesses whose testimony can be relevant are government witnesses. When that strategy fails, they simply have their FBI lab tailor it's findings to ensure a guilty verdict. How frightening.

This section of the IG report clearly demonstrates that the FBI, that institution which supposedly serves US in an unbiased and professional manner, simply based their scientific data around any circumstantial evidence they had to hang any defendants in this monstrous act of murder. Not a very comforting thought.

Consider this historic event: During the twelve months preceding the bombing, at a secret range in the New Mexico desert, ANFO explosives experts constructed and destroyed at least eight vehicles in test bombing experiments. The "vehicle bomb expert" is none other than Special Agent Harry Everhart, an employee of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms [ATF]. Amazingly, and just another government coincidence, Agent Everhart was one of the first to report the bombing. This was confirmed by the Department of Treasury that Everhart called the ATF office in Dallas on his cellular phone around 9:20 am. It seems we have another coincidence:

Everhart just happened to be standing near the Murrah building when the bombs went off...

Agent Everhart was based out of the ATF's OKC Resident Agency, serves on the National Response Team (NRT), which is a group of experienced bomb and arson investigators who respond to major bombing crime scenes in the U.S. It has also been confirmed that Everhart served on a secret government project in 1994 that conducted ANFO testing and C-4, to blow up cars and vans in a government experiment known as "Project Dipole Might" - only a year before the bombing. This project, also coincidentally, was initiated under Bill Clinton's NSC White House staff shortly after he took office in 1993. This report, released under a FOIA [Freedom of information Act] is a really eye opener and one should not eat lunch before you read it.

The photos of the yellow Ryder truck and it's remains in the basement of the World Trade Center contradict the government's invention. In those photos you clearly see the truck parked next to similar concrete reinforced steel columns - they are still standing even though this truck bomb went off right next to them. We are to believe, even with no knowledge of explosives, only common sense, that a truck bomb parked 50' from the front door of the building, did that magnitude of damage when a truck bomb of approximately the same size and components, parked next to columns of the same structural integrity did little damage?

How many Americans are aware of the DoD [Department of Defense] Pentagon report, covered up by the government, its "experts" and it's media? In this report, two explosives experts, independent of each other, concluded that five high explosive bombs were placed at strategic locations on the columns inside the building and that the bombs have a Middle Eastern "signature" pointing either to Iraqi or Syrian involvement. This report also says that McVeigh did play a role in the bombing as a 'useful idiot.' Where's Dan Rather, Jennings, Brokaw, Janet Reno?

Question: Could McVeigh or Nichols or any of the Elhoim City flock have the knowledge and the security clearance to get these bombs inside a federal building?

That's laughable if it weren't so tragic.

A car parked in front of the building is still visible but the damage is from the building, not a bomb. A truly remarkable visual picture of about 10 - 15 minutes after the second bomb - no truck. No truck remains. There could be a car in front of the one you see in the picture, but only a photo from the other direction will tell us this. It could have been a car bomb in that location that caused a small indention in the pavement. One things for certain, there were thousands and thousands of photographs taken that day, why haven't we ever seen one of the alleged 30 x 8 crater? The June 1, 1995 issues of Time and Newsweek, the May 7, 1997 issue of the Denver Post and allsubsequent mention of the crater all use only artist's line drawings of the big crater.

Why no photographs? Because it is a lie.

In June of 1995, I received approximately eight hours of live, raw, unedited film from KFOR as the bombing unfolded. I gave this film to my friends in Ft. Worth in late 1996 and earlier this year, they turned out a video titled, Cover-up in Oklahoma. This is one of the most valuable tools we have in proving the cover-up about this despicable act. The live helicopter shots prove this big crater in front of the building as the big lie that it is - it simply isn't there. Is it there later? Yes, much later, but this crater was probably made by the back-hoes brought in to check the natural gas mains under the street.

3. In these articles previously mentioned, you will read the confirmation of a car bomb by Mayor, Ron Nordick which then turns into a van and THEN into a truck bomb. Mayor Nordick is on the video previously mentioned. He's standing right there - you mean to tell me that he couldn't see with his own eyes there was no big yellow Ryder truck? Mayor Nordick specifically says that the ATF and other law enforcement have confirmed to him - again, standing right in front of the building - that it was a car bomb. Now we're told by the government and their media that it took three days to figure out it was a yellow Ryder truck? Come on. The leads to the truck rental facility turned cold and then all of a sudden, the facility in Junction City is the place where the alleged truck was rented? Front Page of the NY Times, April 21, 1995: The Trail:

Federal agents raced to a truck rental agency in Kansas in pursuit of suspected bombers but the trail quickly grew faint.

Isn't it amazing that Terry Nichols rents a big, yellow beacon of a truck, practically in his own back yard to commit one of the most heinous criminal acts in the history of our nation? Is he that stupid? Iif he and McVeigh had all this cash to buy fertilizer and carry out something this sophisticated, why do the same dumb things the bombers of the World Trade Center did - use fake ID, have their faces seen, no gloves so fingerprints are found anywhere from either one of them - to rent the weapon of mass destruction? Why not just buy an old junker that's free and clear that won't leave a paper trail? Were they just begging to be caught or was someone making sure that the FBI would get their man with all these "lucky breaks" the newspapers kept referring to?

How is it that within 24 hours after the bombing the government comes up with sketches of two suspects that could have been drawn from the suspect's sitting right in front of the artist? I mean, the accuracy is uncanny. Why did the government call off the search for more John Doe's? My money says they are protecting their own assets.

Other than political correctness, why did the government loudly proclaim that it wasn't middle-Eastern origin individuals involved, only anti-government white males? Same edition of the Times, page A22: "...break in the investigation came with the discovery, among truck wreckage found on the streets around the building, of a piece of metal with a vehicle identification number. That number led quickly in turn, to the Ryder truck agency in Junction City". What piece of metal? Not the axle.

4. During the trial, America was shown surveillance film from the Regency Towers, a 20-story building across and down the street from the Murrah Building. I stood in front of that building on May 18, 1995. This film clearly shows a Ryder truck [we don't know the color because the film is in black and white and Ryder does rent 23' - 26' white trucks to the public] at 8:57 am on April 19, 1995. We see the truck move on but we don't know where it goes. Some saw a truck pull up in front of the building, someone get out and walk away. I have yet to hear anyone say what happened to this truck someone exited - did it stay there, did it drive on - what?

Consider this coincidence: Martin Keating, brother of Oklahoma Governor Frank Keating, claims he has/had copies of the surveillance film from the Southwest Bell building across the street from the Murrah building. The film from the Regency Towers survived completely intact. The government claims the Southwest Bell film didn't - my money says they're lying and they're lying to protect their assets and their invented story.

5. When I was in OKC on May 18 - 19th, 1995, I spoke with many people - all heard two bombs with the second being the most powerful. I was told that the axle was found on the other side of the YMCA building. During the trial, the jury, and this was shown on local TV, saw pictures of a truck axle on the hood of the car of the man waiting inside the Regency Towers for his wife. This location was said to be 575' from where the alleged Ryder truck blew up and in the opposite direction that I was told the axle was found. The government states that they traced this axle to the Junction City Ryder truck rental facility by the VIN [vehicle identification number].

This is a reprehensible lie. These rental truck companies don't put the VIN on interchangeable parts because they so frequently exchange them for repairs. The VIN numbers are on the frame or non-removable parts, i.e. the inside dashboard window.

More lies.

I have no training in explosives, physics and detonations. But, how could a truck, loaded with 1,000, then 1,400, then 2,500, then 4,000 then 4,800 pounds of fertilizer blow up, creating a crater 30' around by 8' deep and have the force of the blast blow the axle up in the air instead of down into the crater? In some of the articles in the first three days after the bombing, one finds brief mention about pieces of a truck found away from the building and this remains a mystery to me.

6. Recall the statements from Hoppy Heidelberg former foreman of the original grand jury back in 1995 which eventually indicted Mr. McVeigh and Mr. Nichols. Hoppy said there had to be two yellow Ryder trucks that day for the government's inventive tale to work. I would love to see the insurance records for Ryder - I believe they are missing two yellow Ryder trucks. I don't know where they are, but I think they were a decoy for the car bomb across the street. One may have been damaged in the general vicinity; I just don't know but I'll bet getting all the film from KFOR, Ch-8 and all the stills from AP will tell you a whole lot about the crime scene. Do you think the government has all this film? Of course they do and they're banking on the American people not having the resources to obtain copies for general viewing.

What kind of defense counsel would ignore such an important point?

I also pose the following question: Why was the alleged key allegedly found in an alley near the YMCA building? I walked that entire area and I know where the government is referring to. This is also the area I was told in May 1995 that the alleged axle was found. This makes sense if a key and axle are found in the same area.

8. The blackest smoke seen from the first photos taken and seen on the video, Coverup in Oklahoma, is from two cars parked across the street from the building. The fire trucks are parked where the alleged Ryder truck was supposed to have blown up on level ground. We have conflicting stories about where the axle was found and if the truck companies don't put VIN numbers on the axles, what vehicle does the axle found on the car in front of the Regency Towers belong to? Did the VIN number on the one found in front of the Regency Towers actually match? Who knows.

9. On day one of Mr. McVeigh's trial, the government's own witness caused them extreme heart palps. Mr. Williams testified under cross by the defense team that the day of the bombing, approximately 60-80 large blue drums were inside the Murrah building for purposes of trash collection. Pieces of blue plastic drums were found on adjacent rooftops. The government maintains that blue plastic drums full of fertilizer flew hundreds of feet in the air, like Superman, and came from inside a Yellow Ryder truck that blew itself into a 30 x 8 crater that no one can see. We need the names of those entering the building from that firm within 48 hrs of the bombing and samples of the blue plastic drums they use. My money is that the pieces found on the rooftopscame from the ones inside the building and that's how the bombs were brought in.

10. How did Mr. McVeigh get the yellow Mercury Marquis and the yellow Ryder truck in front of the building and on a side street at the same time? The Merc was seen leaving the scene on the side street. If Mr. Nichols wasn't there, who was? McVeigh couldn't have driven both vehicles at the same time. How come the newspaper accountings in the days following the bombing, talk about McVeigh "look-alikes"? I have a problem with this.

The government maintains that one truck bomb caused the massive structural damage to the building. Is there anything or anyone else to dispute this?

Why haven't Trochmann and this pilot been questioned by the appropriate government investigators? The photos and time they were taken could have tremendous implication regarding this bombing, yet the government, again, is turning a blind eye.

Why?

Item 2: In the article accompanying the photo, third column: one sentence states that at least one of the bombs were taken to Kirkland Air Force Base in Albuquerque. I alled the newspaper who ran this article and photo and spoke with Janet Douglas, the publisher's wife. She stated that her husband knows the identify of the individual at Kirkland AFB but won't reveal it because the individual is afraid to come forward. I realize that this person at Kirkland should be afraid and because of that fear, he/she, refuses to come forward.

According to the government, McVeigh rented a yellow Ryder truck at this facility. is there anything to dispute this?

1 . Under cross by the defense during McVeigh's trial, the government witness admitted that McVeigh's fingerprints were not on the rental contract. Whose fingerprints were on this contract? Was there a palm print? These rental contracts are 8« x 11 and multiple pages. You not only sign them, but you initial boxes regarding insurance, etc. Someone's prints are on them and probably a palm print. McVeigh was in the military, they had his fingerprints, his toe prints and everything else.

This rental facility is near a military reservation. Mr. McVeigh, in my opinion being married to a retired Army Colonel, looks a lot like thousands of other young G.I.'s. This rental facility apparently did a lot of business with a large percentage of young military G.I.'s. I think identification here is blurry at best and if I were a juror, 1 would have a difficult time voting to execute based on this type of flimsy "evidence." I have rented both U-Haul and Ryder. A credit card or huge cash deposit is required. How come the one in Junction City didn't require anything other than a driver's license and an $80.00 deposit? Yes, this is near an area heavy with military and maybe they accepted military ID but whoever rented that truck didn't use military ID and there was no big cash deposit.

The FBI had the entire counter in the facility dismantled and shipped to DC. Again, Mr. McVeigh's prints were not found anywhere on the counter or in the building or on the door jamb. He touched nothing while he was allegedly renting the truck?

Something is missing here - like whose fingerprints did the FBI find on the counter?

There is a connection here with either the FBI, ATF or the military, I can feel it.

Allegedly McVeigh and one other person used fake ID to rent the truck. The media accounts reveal some interesting things about this. An amazing report in the NY Times, April 22, 1995, page 8, column 1, check this:

"Then a routine check of his [McVeigh's] social security number matched one flagged by the FBI as belonging to a suspect in the bombing."

Here's another very interesting statement in the same story quoted above: "...the Bureau [ATF] lost none of its employees in the blast officials said today because its offices were on the side not damaged by the bomb." Not according to the floor plans.

Lies, truth, lies. Is it any wonder the American people are so confused and so many filled with rage?

The front page of the Denver Post, April 2 1, 1 995 has two sketches of John Does 1 & 2 with the following:

John Doe No. 1: right-handed. How did the government know that one of their suspects is right handed? This is only 48 hours after the blast, actually sooner. The Post is delivered by 6:00 am. So by 6:00 am the 21st, less than 48 hours after the blast, the government puts out this sketch with the knowledge that the suspect, a dead ringer for Mr. McVeigh is right handed? Is McVeigh right handed? Is this from the Ryder truck facility or from the handwriting analysis on the rental agreement which did not have McVeigh's fingerprints? Can the government state that a right handed person left a truck bomb in front of a building? As Sinatra said in one of his melodies: "cause it's witchcraft."

John Doe No. 2, a dead ringer for Michael Brescia: tattoo visible beneath T-shirt on left arm, possibly a smoker. Is this from the Ryder truck people? No, it probably came from the ATF since they had these people from Elhoim City under investigation. Does Michael Brescia have a tattoo? Ask the ATF. For God's sake, the artist's sketch of John Doe #2 is a dead ringer for Brescia.

Brescia is now in jail, charged and convicted on charges in a separate string of crimes - very conveniently tucked away in jail. However, to this day, the government has completely ignored him as one of the strongest suspects, next to Andy Strassmeir. Why is that? Why is it that the FBI allowed a key suspect in the bombing, Strassmeir, to flee back to Germany, wait one year to interview him over the phone and write him off as nothing to do with the bombing when too much points directly at him? A group called CAUSE and it's two head-honcho's, specifically Kirk Lyons, brag about how proud they are that they assisted Strassmeir in fleeing the country. Isn't this called obstruction of justice? I guess not when the FBI is the one obstructing justice. Is it any wonder that the Department of Justice is known in this country by the nickname, Department of Injustice?

And another story in the same edition: Junction City, April 21:

Recall the government maintains that McVeigh and Nichols spent two days prior to the bombing, after renting the truck, possibly in the area of Hardy Lake, making the bomb. How could McVeigh be in a haircut joint on Tuesday around noon time if he was supposed to be at a lake building a bomb? Recall there is a witness who claims a yellow Ryder was parked near Hardy Lake, this man seems quite adamant about this.

Also recall the photos that pilot allegedly took near Hardy Lake showing a military operation with a yellow Ryder truck parked inside a real "compound".

There were many witnesses who claim to have seen McVeigh in or around the area of 5th and Robinson that morning. The question I have is which McVeigh? There is an amazing photo run by Soldier of Fortune June 1995. You can see that there is an uncanny resemblance to the unidentified ATF agent and Tim McVeigh. My question is this: How did SOF key in on this photo of these three ATF agents in connection with Waco? As far as my memory serves me, I have never seen any photos of the trial at Waco. Cameras are not allowed in federal courtrooms. This photo carries the caption that this unidentified agent sat in the press section of the courtroom with a burp gun under his trench coat. Excuse me, but I have to believe that in an extremely high profile case like Waco, security was very tight - how did anyone get away with bringing a "burp" gun into the courtroom?

How did Soldier of Fortune get this photo and how did they make the connection within weeks after the bombing? Yes, there was a lot of convenient speculation about Waco being the catalyst for the bombing, but something doesn't ring true here. There's something wrong with this picture. I for one would like to see the film [security cameras] from the courtroom in San Antonio where the Waco trials took place. I think it's critical that we see these three men while they are in the courtroom and you should then be able to determine if this is Tim McVeigh or his twin.

The government maintains that McVeigh bombed the Murrah building in retaliation for Waco. I can darned well promise you that I have been incensed about Waco since I watched the whole thing live on television and Janet the Butcher Reno, the ATF, FBI and the military - in violation of posse comitatus - none have been held accountable.

The American people have not, I repeat, not been given the truth about Waco.

If McVeigh was so angry that 17 children were gassed and burned to death by the government at Waco, why would he take the chance of blowing up a building that was full of children? This simply doesn't make any sense. If he just blew up a building and  was so happy with his handy work as a crazed serial killer, why when stopped by Trooper Charlie Hanger, did he politely hand over his gun and cooperate with law enforcement? McVeigh is a seasoned war veteran, decorated, a model soldier, a man who lived by discipline. Murdering innocent people, regardless of the reason, doesn't fit, at least to me it doesn't being married to a retired Army Colonel.

Why wasn't this judge and all those FBI, ATF put on the stand and questioned under oath about what did they know, how much and who warned them to stay out of thebuilding? The answer is painfully obvious: cover-up.

There can be no mistake about a connection between McVeigh and the people who reside at this location. The media made and continues to make big hay that McVeigh and Nichols were militia, anti-government kooks. I think we can pretty much state with finality that neither of them belonged to any militia groups. As far as Elhoim City goes, we know at this point that the ATF was involved in serious surveillance of this group. We know that their informant, Carol Howe, spent months at Elhoim City and warned the ATF about a possible terrorist attack by this faction.

And speaking of ethics, during Ms. Howe's trial, we learned from sworn testimony by the FBI, that the Reverend Robert Millar, grand poobah of the Elhoim City crowd was actually an FBI informant all along. So here we have ATF & FBI informants inside this Nazi organization, one feeding the ATF warnings about a possible bombing and who knows what the good Reverend was feeding the FBI....

Some big questions scream to be answered here:

Did anyone in the Elhoim City community have the security clearance or knowledge to build high-explosive bombs and bring them into the Murrah building? Possibly Andy Strassmeir, but since the FBI deliberately allowed him to return to Germany and put him out of touch, we may never know. How about Michael Brescia? McVeigh?

Remember what the Pentagon report on the bombs said: McVeigh was involved as a "useful idiot". McVeigh allegedly was linked to the Elhoim City people by a phone card. We only have the government's word on this and in my book, they have zero, zip, zilch credibility. It would have been nice to be able to subpoena Joseph Bealie Gray to testify at McVeigh's trial. This former FBI agent investigated the OKC bombing and Waco. He retrieved phone records during the investigation of the bombing and was the agent who helped direct the FBI's hidden electronics surveillance during the Waco situation. Unfortunately, Mr. Gray retired from the Bureau in 1996 and died at the age of 54 from an apparent heart attack in February of 1997.

My husband is an old Army guy, been to war college, been to war. We've talked about this. My money says that the Elhoim City connection, while real and apparently dangerous was just a diversion. If there are individuals in that group who are involved in potential crimes, they should be investigated. Amazingly, to this day, all those at Elhoim City, have been conspicuously left alone by any government agency. If it were you or me, we'd already have gotten the lethal injection. The question is why? All that aside, were these potentially dangerous people, the ones who pulled off this well executed, well funded and highly sophisticated bombing? I don't believe so.

Right after McVeigh was identified in Perry, brief coverage was given regarding his request for a doctor. It was reported that he believed he had a bio-chip in his buttock, inserted by the Army, it hurt and he wanted it taken out. See the front page story, Denver Post, April 23, 1995, statement by Phillip Morawski: "...had this real sharp pain in his rear. He thought they [Army] had planted one of those chips that they have for identifying...." It is critical we find out if McVeigh does have a bio-chip. It would certainly explain some of his bizarre behavior.

For some time I had one of those "what's wrong with this picture" nag at me. I believe the two individuals caught by KFOR leaving the bomb site, where you can see the heavy black smoke billowing out from the cars in the Southwest Bell parking lot, were involved in this horror. I believe we have identified one of them and I am relatively certain this individual is an FBI informant. This individual was interviewed by Rep. Charles Key [Rep., OK State Legislature] and his alibi has proven to be a lie. Have the FBI or ATF interviewed this guy? Get real. They have left him alone even though after an interview by a state legislator proved his alibi to be a big lie - why?

Besides the original film I mentioned earlier, I also received approximately eight hours of live film from KFOR spanning the time frame between August 1995 through about May of 1996. On this video is extensive coverage by KFOR in August 1995 about syringes being found on the trays going to McVeigh and Nichols while they were still incarcerated at the El Reno facility. Have these syringes ever been analyzed for any fingerprints and what was found in those syringes? Why has the American public - outside OKC - never heard of any of this? Do you think Rather, the Washington Post, et al, aren't aware of all this?

A reliable source has told me that many families could not view the remains of their loved ones. The building was blown from the inside. Remains would carry the residue from the bombs and the physical condition of the bodies. Remains would likely show death or contributing factors to death by bomb material and not just debris and falling walls. If it were my loved one, as painful as it would be, I would have the body exhumed and tested by an independent forensic pathologist to determine any bomb material chemicals or residue.

The implosion of the building was a crime at best and I consider to be obstruction of justice and tampering with evidence, just to name a few violations of the law. The remains of the building were buried in huge craters that remain under guard to this day. I was at the Waco ruins in August of 1993. Several armed guards with rifles were guarding the charred remains. What is the government so afraid of anyone finding in all this rubble? To me the answer is obvious: bomb fragments, residue, chemicals, etc., that would expose their fertilizer bomb lie. What about the radio active material detected in the building? Oh, yes there was.

I believe that the media, along with people representing our government should be charged with obstruction of justice, tampering with evidence and cover-up, not just in OKC but in Waco. Only one FBI agent has been brought to justice in the Ruby Ridge murders; he coped a plea for destroying a key government document. Now finally after five years and the persistence of decent Americans, Lon Horiuchi, the man who put a .302 in the forehead of Vicki Weaver while she was holding her 10-month old baby, is being tried for involuntary manslaughter. What an insult. This crack marksman should be tried for murder.

Back to OKC. What about the seismograph readings that disprove the government's fairy tale of a big fertilizer truck bomb? Just another unexplained anomaly? The government says the two explosions shown on the graphs are just aftershocks. How dumb do they think the scientific community and we the people are? The only ones who buy the government's theory is the government, McVeigh's jury and those Americans who rely only on the government's media for their source of information.

Does it never end, the lies?

20/20 ran an episode January 17, 1997 that so strongly supported that the government knew in advance that an act of terrorism was going to occur somewhere against some government building, nothing was ever said again by 20/20. Colonel Roger Charles (USMC, ret.) was the lead researcher for this story. On February 6th, this investigative reporter and his team were about to present a follow-up to that story which involved Carol Howe, the ATF informant who spent considerable time inside Elhoim City. It didn't happen because ABC caved in under pressure from the U.S. Department of InJustice. Being a man of integrity, Col. Charles took it upon himself to call into the Don Imus morning show and blow the whistle on the cowardice of ABC in covering up the story. As expected, Charles was "released" by ABC. Reprehensible.

Again, ATF informant, Carol Howe told her case officer [which was proven during her trial] that the Elhoim City folks were planning to blow up a building, possibly coinciding with the execution of Richard Snell, possibly Tulsa or OKC. One thing for sure, if these Elhoim City people were planning to bring down the Murrah building, they certainly must be scientifically deficient to think they could do it with 1,000 pounds of fertilizer in a car parked out front of this 9-story structure. Judge Richard Matsch refused to allow Ms. Howe to testify at McVeigh's trial. Just how does a jury come to any sort of decision when 99% of all credible evidence and testimony is barred from presentation in the courtroom? Yet, all the legal pundits in the government's media, i.e. Jeffrey Tobin, Dan Blather all of them, praise Judge Richard Matsch as a bastion of judicial integrity.

Additionally, there was a locker in their offices which contained a large amount of C- 4 plastic explosives that probably killed a few people when the second bomb went off inside the building. What's wrong with this picture? Excuse me, but is this the place to put a child care center full of God's precious gifts?

As I have said from the beginning, I am not defending Mr. McVeigh. I have looked at this act of cowardice from day one with an open mind. Those involved should receive the fullest prosecution by the law - regardless of who they are or who employs them.

Something too many have forgotten because of the media hysteria, is that that everyone under our precious legal system, albeit one now totally corrupted by judges and politicians, is entitled to a fair and impartial trial. Since the jury in Denver was fed lies and the actions of Judge Richard Matsch should get him impeached, is it any wonder that they found McVeigh guilty? The government presented some circumstantial evidence, 90% hearsay and 1OO% gut-wrenching survivors and family members.

There is something very wrong here with the actions and behavior of this individual they call Tim McVeigh. Recall what Hoppy Heidelberg said about McVeigh during the grand jury in 1995? That he wouldn't talk, that he's playing good soldier right up to the end? Do we really know who this guy is? He was voted most talkative in his high school yearbook. All video prior to the bombing reflect a personable, smiling young man. Since April 21, 1995, all we have seen is a robot.

Did Mr. McVeigh go against everything and all the principles he believed in so strongly? Killing children when he was so upset about children dying at Waco? Does he have a microchip in his buttocks? This is very important. I don't like conspiracy theories and I've read mountains of information on the government's programs, i.e. MK ULTRA, which were real and well documented. I know that mind-control is real, the government has and does avail themselves of this process.

Once you read this extremely well documented material, I think you'll agree that it's highly probable that Lee Harvey Oswald not only didn't shoot Kennedy but that he was under mind-control. No science fiction, Mr. Russell's material is based on well documented research.

Why has McVeigh sat like a stone for the past 2 1/2 years? If McVeigh does have a bio-chip implant, it certainly could explain why this man, accused of such a heinous crime, would just sit around so casually while the rest of us cry our eyes out over the dead and survivors. After the jury announced his death sentence, why would McVeigh turn to his parents and mouth, it's okay? After the jury announced his death sentence, why would McVeigh give them a hand signal similar to a peace sign? This is totally bizarre and something is wrong with this picture.

Stephen Jones appeared on 60 Minutes June 15, 1997, the Today Show and CBS This Morning on June 16, 1997. Mr. Jones stated that another group had an interest in blowing up the Murrah building for years. He was obviously referring to the Elhoim City group. I don't know why the Elhoim City group targeted the Murrah building butmost likely it was because the ATF & FBI had many records, documents and evidence stored in that building. However, recall that Carol Howe, the ATF informant inside Elhoim City stated that a possible act of terrorism could occur at a federal building inTulsa or OKC.

Mr. Jones stated that there was a German and middle-East connection. While he didn't say so on television, I know he was referring to Andy Strassmier that the FBI let getaway and is now untouchable in Germany. He correctly stated that the judge refused to allow exculpatory witnesses and evidence. He stated that Mr. McVeigh could not take the stand in his own defense because of possible prosecution in OKC which would mean a Fifth Amendment conflict. He would not say if Mr. McVeigh admitted any guilt and he stated that Mr. McVeigh did not want to die a martyr.

[Update August 1998: The duplicitous DA in OKC, Bob Macy, said as soon as the Feds got done with McVeigh & Nichols he was going to haul them down to OKC and charge them under state law for 160 murders. Well, what's he waiting for? McVeigh & Nichols couldn't testify on their own behalf because of Fifth Amendment complications and a state trial. Could it be that Macy never intended to prosecute them but just let them think it would so they couldn't take the stand in their own defense?

No? Please, take off the blinders.]

The Bombing: There may or may not have been a car bomb parked right in front of the Murrah building. From the photo in the Denver Post, April 20, 1 995, one car is visible between the fire truck and the sidewalk; damage appears to be from debris.

There appears to be a small indention of the pavement in some of the helicopter shots close to the corner of Fifth & Robinson. Was this made by a car bomb? From the live helicopter shots we can see a flat, level street, fire truck in position and pumping water into the building, little debris on the street and two cars across the street billowingheavy black smoke.

McVeigh was allegedly seen buying racing fuel. Receipts were found with his fingerprint for fertilizer. We know that McVeigh spent time at Mr. Nichols farm. I know farmers in Colorado who use fertilizer with other mixtures to dislodge huge tree stumps and rocks on their property. They probably have similar receipts. They don't blow up buildings.

Elhoim City: We know the ATF was seriously involved in investigating this group of people. We know that they had an informant named Carol Howe. We know that Andy Strassmeir, a German national was very involved with this group as was the deadringer for John Doe #2, Michael Brescia. It appears that this group had made some threats to blow up the Murrah Building in 1983. We know that one of their top dogs, Richard Snell, was executed the evening of April 19, 1995.

Mr. McVeigh: It is apparent that Tim McVeigh, after leaving the Army, drifted around for awhile, had very strong feelings about the government's gassing and murder of 80+ Americans at Waco.

It is possible that McVeigh has a bio-chip in his buttocks which can control his feelings and actions? Based on comments made by the former foreman of the grand jury in 1995, Hoppy Heidelberg, it is possible that McVeigh has intimate knowledge of illegal military activities and therefore would have to be neutralized. Play on his weakness and vulnerability and set him up as a patsy.

Let me quote Hoppy from an interview he gave to Jon Rappaport, December 16, 1995:

Q: Did McVeigh's sister say McVeigh told her he had worked for a special operations Army group that was engaged in criminal activity?

A: Not exactly. She said something like that.

Q: That her brother told her such a special operations group existed?

A: Yes. But more than that.

Q: That they had recruited him and he turned them down?

A: Yes.

[Recall the photos of this alleged military operation outside the Hardy Lake area - photos enclosed]

Q: He [McVeigh] didn't testify at the grand jury?

A: He won't talk. I don't know if he's happy to be a martyr or he's confident he won't get convicted. He doesn't seem terribly worried. Seems possible he thinks he was working for the government and won't be convicted. That's speculation."

1. A Ryder truck with fertilizer and ammonia nitrate scientifically could not and did not blow up the Murrah building. It was blown from inside by high explosive charges placed on the columns. At least three were taken out of the building within 2-6 hours after the second bomb went off. Where are the bombs and what did their "signatures" show when dismantled? My money says rogue elements within the government know exactly what happened to those bombs.

2. Who had the clearance to get these high explosive bombs into the building and who had the technical knowledge to build them? McVeigh? Nichols? Strassmeir? Brescia? Middle-Eastern terrorists - some most certainly were involved and you can look to the Strassmeir/CIA connection here.

3. There may and probably was a car bomb parked either in front of the curb close to Robinson & 5th or across the street in the Southwestern Bell parking lot which contained some explosives. This may or may not have been the actions of individuals from the Elhoim City group. This car bomb did not blow up the Murrah building and kill and maim.

4. The ATF knew that the Elhoim City people were possibly planning an act of terrorism against a federal building, either in Tulsa or OKC. Carol Howe, their informant can confirm this, she was not allowed to testify at McVeigh's trial. McVeigh was involved with this group of people as an idealistic patsy.

6. Despite overwhelming information, the government has refused to arrest any one else, including the Elhoim City group, except McVeigh and Nichols. Why? Because they are protecting their own people who planned and carried out this interior bombing with the Elhoim City group providing them with a perfect diversion and cover story. McVeigh's social security number unbelievably and conveniently matched one "flagged" by the FBI as belonging to one of their suspects - suspects who at the time had no name, no face. How could the government know a social security number?

As Patrick Henry said: "We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth..." Can anyone who has read this report and done their homework, honestly say that the government and the government's media have told the American people the truth, the whole truth about what happened April 19, 1995? They can't and that should scare every thinking American.

As unpalatable as this might seem to the trusting American pubic, only a very sophisticated operation could have pulled off this bombing. The Elhoim City group planning a possible fertilizer bomb in a car in front of the building for revenge over whatever was a perfect cover.

8. Judge Richard Matsch should be impeached. In a trial of such magnitude, he refused to allow any exculpatory witnesses or evidence - in fact any and all evidence which would prove the government's lies - he had sealed. Stephen Jones should have gone to the appellate level and to the Supreme court if necessary to get Matsch removed as judge and all evidence allowed into the courtroom for a jury to see and all witnesses for them to hear. A gross miscarriage of justice is the only word I can use for McVeigh's trial - miscarriage of justice both for McVeigh and for our legal system.

After McVeigh's conviction and when he was formally sentenced to death, he used a quote from a dissent in a 1928 U.S. Supreme Court ruling to address the court. The media blasted this portion:

"If the court please, I wish to use the words of Justice Brandeis dissenting in Olmsteadto speak for me. He wrote, 'Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher.For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example.' That's all I have."

The government's media and the families of the victim's said this was McVeigh'sconfession. The rest of Justice Brandeis' quote conveniently omitted is as follows:

"Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt of law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law, the end justifies the means - to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private citizen - would bring terrible retribution."

Some of you may have heard that before McVeigh's formal sentencing he openly and publicly for the first time blasted his counsel, Stephen Jones, stating that he had foundout that Jones repeatedly lied to him. I don't know if this is true but I suspect it is. The best and only course I believe McVeigh can take at this time is to confess to any illegal activity he was involved in and if he wasn't part of the bombing, then he needs to make that clear. If he was involved but didn't know the extent of the events which ultimately occurred, then he needs to go public and as they say, bare his soul. He has nothing to lose at this point.

Hopefully we will find out sometime in the near future. I would dearly love to see the Pentagon report the government has covered-up. In this report, McVeigh is referred to as a "useful idiot". How did they come to this conclusion?

The appeal process is now underway for McVeigh. The families and survivors will have to continue to live with all the pain. The government continues to lie and coverup.

So many questions, so much cover-up.

Hoppy Heidelberg, former grand jury foreman in OKC, will hold public meetings once the current county grand jury in OKC investigating the bombing finishes its session. Hoppy and other dedicated individuals will hold open hearings and want the public to attend. These hearings will be video taped so that everyone in America will be able to see and hear all the witnesses and their testimony.

We must get to the truth about this bombing and see to it that everyone connected with this sickening act are brought to justice and the appropriate sentences carried out.

There are untold numbers of people out there who believe McVeigh was railroaded, setup or just lynched because of his political beliefs. There are those who haven't been given 1% of the truth about what went on but believe he's 100% guilty. For the sake of the people who died, their families, for the integrity of our nation, we've got to find out the real truth and only the people of this country can make that happen by a very loud and persistent outcry.

Devvy Kidd

May 23, 2001

Before I get started on the meat of this piece , I want to say something about a common question I get from people: "Devvy, you know the government is covering up on this bombing, we'll never know the truth, why bother?" Why bother? How about this for starters:

Slaughtered April 19, 1995:

Administration

Security Administration

Urban Development

Housing and Urban Development

Social Security Administration

Housing and Urban Development

Urban Development

officer

Security Administration

Credit Union

Urban Development

sherriff's secretary, assigned to DEA

Water Resources Board

and Urban Development

Development

inspector

Housing and Urban Development

Administration

Housing and Urban Development

representative

representative

Housing and Urban Development

officer, U.S. Marine Corps Recruiting Office

customer

specialist, U.S. Recruiting Office

Credit Union

Credit Union

Defense, Defense and Investigative Service

Social Security Administration

Federal Employees Credit Union.

Enforcement Administration

Agriculture

Services Administration

Administration

Enforcement Administration

Army Recruiting Office

Credit Union

housing, Housing and Urban Development

personnel specialist, Housing and Urban Development

Union

Service

Employees Credit Union

Development

Development

engineer, Federal Highway Administration

in charge, Secret Service

Housing and Urban Development

Housing and Urban Development

Administration

representative, Social Security Administration

Please note the absence of ATF and FBI personnel. Not that I would have wished any of them to die that day, but it is glaringly obvious that they were gone from the building that day and that they had prior warning to stay away.

I thought I was going to knock out this update in a day or two. I've spent the last five days, in between everything else, combing more than 500 web sites looking for specific things. This piece is not a re-hash of the other pieces I have done on the bombing.

For the nay-sayers and skeptics out there like Bill O'Reilly (FOX), I recommend you read these pieces first so that you can see what was going on back at the beginning. Then I strongly recommend you get the video, Cover-Up in OKC. This video contains a live affidavit by a woman named Jane Graham, a bombing survivor who was in the building when the bombs went off. A woman who was barred from testifying at the grand jury which was convened in OKC that eventually indicted McVeigh and Nichols. Nor was she allowed to testify at McVeigh's trial.

I arrived in Denver, Colorado on May 11th for my daughter's college graduation. During the day on the car radio, I heard the news that McVeigh's execution was stayed. The reason given by the feds was that an FBI field agent suddenly decided to turn over 3,000 documents, mostly 302's (witness statements). Kinda like Hillary Clinton finding the Rose Law Firm billing records on the coffee table in the private residence of the White House 21/2 years after they were requested by the Special Council. Yeah, right. The FBI even put out a real dignified looking press release on this:

http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel01/defenbaugh.htm

For Immediate Release

May 11, 2001

Washington D.C.

FBI National Press Office

Statement of Special Agent in Charge Danny Defenbaugh

Regarding OKBOMB Documents

The investigation into the April 19, 1995 bombing of the Alfred P.

Murrah Building, referred to as "OKBOMB", was one of the most labor intensive efforts in FBI history. This investigation produced millions of records, including 23,290 pieces of evidence, over 238,000 photographs, and in excess of 28,000 interviews. The OKBOMB Task Force and Director Freeh requested all FBI offices to forward items and documentation relating to the investigation to the Task Force. On numerous occasions, commencing in the fall of 1995, we sought and obtained numerous assurances from FBI field offices and legal attaches that diligent searches for documents had taken place and that all matters relating to the investigation had been made available for inclusion in the discovery process.

In December of 2000, the FBI initiated procedures to ensure that all OKBOMB investigative records were appropriately archived. Over the course of the last several months, the FBI exercised due diligence to ensure that all records created as a result of the investigation were logged into and compared with each of 26 data bases which serve as a repository for information. During this process it was determined that some of the materials from various FBI field offices were not a part of the investigative database. Moreover, this was the first time the OKBOMB task force had seen these materials, and none were used in the Government's case. I informed senior FBI officials at Headquarters for the first time on Tuesday, May 8, 2001 that the archiving process had turned up these materials.

These materials included results of interviews, notes, and transmittal envelopes which contain physical items.

The FBI is working closely with the prosecutors and the Justice Department to carefully review each item. The materials have been provided to the defense attorneys, who are also reviewing each of the items to ensure that there is nothing that bears on the convictions or sentences of Timothy McVeigh or Terry Nichols.

I have been advised that the Attorney General has ordered an immediate inquiry into this matter by the Department of Justice's Office of the Inspector General.

Citizens of the State of Oklahoma,

Plaintiff

v.

United States Penitentiary

Terre Haute, Indiana,

Defendant

Attorney General, State of Indiana,

a necessary party for matters involving

public charitable trusts doing business

in Indiana,

Necessary Party

State of Oklahoma

County of Oklahoma

Before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared before me Jane Graham, known to me, who, upon being sworn, deposed and stated as follows:

1. I am Jane Graham. I am at least 21 years of age, and I have personal knowledge of the following facts, which facts are true and correct.

2. I am a victim/survivor of the collapse of the Murrah Federal Building on April 19, 1995, in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma.

Among other information, from my location on the 9th floor, I felt both major explosions, and I saw the wet concrete filling in the 24-25 foot "pits" (craters) in the basement of the Murrah Federal Building, within hours after the explosions.

3. I have made myself and my information available to the investigating authorities. However, my testimony was never sought for Grand Jury purposes and for trial purposes.

4. Also, I have been "visited" by officials who have tried to dissuade me from testifying as to the involvement of one Mr.Gary Hunt in the activities surrounding the explosions that collapsed the Murrah Federal Building.

5. I am one of several victims/survivors, and otherwise interested, parties plaintiff in a civil matter pending in Oklahoma arising from facts and circumstances of that bombing. It is difficult to continue with litigation when the evidence keeps ending up destroyed or otherwise made unavailable for any purpose.

6. Not only is there an interest in maintaining justice and fairness in the judicial proceedings of which I am a party, and with all matters stemmingfrom that disaster, but some even more immediate is the possibility that the execution will not be within the authority normally expected for such procedures, but rather outside that authority. An entire group of us have endured quite a bit, directly, and if there's a way to prevent further damage, which could be rather serious in nature, in particular as regards the Warden and his staff, I am just one of several very interested in seeing that such further damage is prevented and avoided where it is at all possible to accomplish.

7. This completes this Affidavit.

(Please see next page for signatures.)

Then Jane Graham filed a lawsuit to stop McVeigh's execution:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN

DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Jane GRAHAM, and V. Z. LAWTON Citizens of the State of Oklahoma,

Plaintiff v. ' Cause No. _______________________

Harley LAPPIN, Warden United States Penitentiary Terre Haute,

Indiana,

Defendant

The Honorable Steve CARTER, Attorney General, State of Indiana, a necessary party for matters involving public charitable trusts doing business in Indiana, a Necessary Party

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT AND APPLICATION FOR (EMERGENCY)

TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

The Parties. 1. Plaintiffs are Citizens of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma.

2. GRAHAM is a victim/survivor of the collapse of the Murrah Federal Building on April 19, 1995, in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. Among other information, from her location on the 9th floor, she felt both major explosions, and she saw the wet concrete filling in the 24-25 foot "pits" (craters) in the basement of the Murrah Federal Building, within hours after the explosions. To date, her testimony was refused for Grand Jury purposes and for trial purposes. She has been "visited" by officials who have tried to dissuade her from testifying as to the involvement of one Mr. Gary Hunt in the activities surrounding the explosions that collapsed the Murrah Federal Building. She is a party plaintiff in a civil matter pending in Oklahoma arising from facts and circumstances of that bombing.

3. LAWTON is a victim/survivor of the collapse of the Murrah Federal Building on April 19, 1995, in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. He was on the 8th floor that morning. He has worked with the Oklahoma City Bombing Investigation Committee, headed by Charles Key, former Oklahoma State Representative. He is a party plaintiff in a civil matter pending in Oklahoma arising from the facts andcircumstances of that bombing.

4. Mr. LAPPIN, a Defendant, is the Warden of the United States Penitentiary located in Terre Haute, Indiana, a resident in which facility is Offender McVeigh. In his capacity as Warden, Mr. LAPPIN is the responsible party for the penitentiary regarding any execution or any stay of execution.

5. Mr. LAPPIN may be served personally through the following business address: Mr. Harley Lappin, Warden United States Penitentiary 4200 Bureau Rd N Terre Haute, Indiana 47808

6. Mr. CARTER is the Attorney General of the State of Indiana, and, in this capacity, is a necessary party for matters involving public charitable trust entities doing business in Indiana.Time to determine with certainty the organizational structure of the prison facility is short, and counsel is preferring to err on the side of too much inclusion and too much notice.

7. Mr. CARTER may be served personally through the followingbusiness address: The Honorable Steve Carter Office of the Indiana Attorney General Indiana Government Center South, 5th Floor 402 West Washington Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 The Authority of This Court.

8. Plaintiffs seek relief in equity. There is no adequate remedy at law.

9. In fact, time being short, Plaintiffs seek emergency equitable relief.

10. Plaintiffs have sufficient interest in, and stake in the outcome of, this matter to have standing.

11. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over these claims for relief and these parties as follows:

A. This Controversy arises under the Constitution, in particular under Article III, section 2, Article IV, section 2, and the Sixth amendment, to the effect that the "transferee" trial court in Colorado lacked subject matter jurisdiction to try any criminal matter that arose in Oklahoma.

B. This Controversy is between Citizens of the State of Oklahoma and at least one Citizen of the State of Indiana, namely the penitentiary, the responsible party of which is the Warden. C. In the event this penitentiary is not a business entity, but rather an agency of the United States Government, then this matter could conceivably involve the United States Government as a party. 12. This court has personal jurisdiction over the parties, in that Mr. LAPPIN works in this State.

13. This court has proper venue, in that Defendant's place of business is in the same county in which this court sits. Overview. This effort intends to operate as an effective stay of execution of Timothy McVeigh, at least a temporary one. That execution is scheduled for early morning, Wednesday, 16 May 2001, which is less than one week from the date of likely filing of this pleading. Had there been any possible way to have initiated this sooner, counsel would certainly have done so. This proceeding does not concern McVeigh, or the death penalty, as such. This proceeding concerns these Plaintiffs,  specifically, and, in a general sense, the personnel of our Armed Forces. For the Plaintiffs, interests of truth and justice are paramount, which interests are furthered by allowing all relevant evidence into the courtroom.

For our Armed Forces personnel, who throughout history have been willing to pay the ultimate sacrifice for our notions of "limited government," for "us," the ones they serve, to "give away" in the courtroom what our Armed Forces personnel are willing to die to preserve on the battlefield is an intolerable circumstance. To carry out an "execution," based on a "judgment" from a court that clearly lacks subject matter jurisdiction, is to spit on the graves of those who have died in service to us, and in the face of those who presently serve us, to prevent that very sort of exercise of power against us, their family, friends and neighbors. Where a defendant is "good for it," and for the punishment that is appropriate, let that defendant be tried in the judicial forum with authority to enter such adjudication and sentence.

Claim 1: Lack of subject matter jurisdiction in the transferee trial court, generally. Criminal matters can be tried only in the State in which they are alleged to have occurred. Since these charges were tried not in Oklahoma, but rather in Colorado, it follows that the transferee Colorado court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to try any criminal matter that arose or occurred within the State of Oklahoma.

Claim 2: Lack of subject matter jurisdiction in any United States District Court to try "murder" Cases. Congress has no power or authority, for the purposes of generating "admissible evidence of Law of the United States," on the subject of "murder." Congress does have "exclusive

legislative Authority," as regards the District of Columbia, and property owned by the United States Government, to define and punish "murder." However, these Cases against McVeigh involve neither the District of Columbia nor property owned by the United States Government. Further, even if there were to come to existence evidence supporting the position that the property on which stood the Murrah Federal Building was property owned by the United States Government, it is still the case that such language, which is "admissible evidence of Law" only in the District (and for US property), is not the basis for any litigation in a court exercising the Article III judicial Power, for such judicial Power does not extend to matters arising under "Law of the District."

Claim 3: Preservation of McVeigh as "evidence." There is still litigation pending, both civil and criminal, as a result of the deaths and damage resulting from the collapse of the Murrah Federal Building. The building itself, is one of the best sources of evidence as to what took place that morning, and that evidence has already been destroyed. It's an interesting and unique view, to be sure, to consider McVeigh as "evidence," but this is an accurate and justiciable point. What he knows, and, even what is in, or not it, his body, is relevant evidence to the continuing litigation, both civil and criminal. To "execute" McVeigh is to destroy evidence needed for the continuing litigation.

The Facts.

Claim 1: The scheduled execution of Timothy McVeigh should be indefinitely postponed, because the death sentence judgment against McVeigh is void and unenforceable. No trial court in Colorado, whether a State or United States trial court, has subject matter jurisdiction to try any Case that arises in Oklahoma.

14. The bombing of the World Trade Center in New York resulted in criminal litigation, which litigation took place in the State of New York.

(Judicial Notice)

15. More recently, the bombing of he church in Alabama resulted in criminal litigation, which litigation took place in the State of Alabama.

(Judicial Notice)

16. The Cases against McVeigh arise from acts and events that took place in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. (Judicial Notice)

17. Oklahoma is a State. (Judicial Notice)

18. The Murrah Federal Building was located in Oklahoma City, which city is within the State of Oklahoma. (Judicial Notice)

19. The Murrah Federal Building collapsed after the ignition of multiple explosions, which building collapse caused the tragic deaths of those victims.

20. As proved by the Eglin Air Force Base Blast Effects Study, led by Brigadier General Benton K. Partin, United States Air Force, retired, former director of the Air Force Armament Technology Laboratory and one of the world's premier explosives and ordnance authorities, among other evidence, in particular the evidence collected and preserved under the direction of Charles Key, former Oklahoma State Representative, it is highly unlikely that the truck bomb, the only explosion attributed to McVeigh, was sufficient to cause the building to collapse.

21. Since the primary purpose of trial is to place responsibility where it belongs, it follows that the judicial process to date has failed to accomplish it's primary purpose.

 22. Further, no criminal matter, not even Treason, can be tried by a court, whether a State or a United States trial court, outside the State in which those acts occurred. (Law)

23. Yet, the Cases against McVeigh were transferred across the Oklahoma State line, namely to Denver, Colorado. (Judicial Notice)

24. Because the transferee court was not in Oklahoma, the transferee court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear any Case against McVeigh. (Conclusion fact/law)

25. Therefore, the adjudication of guilt and the and sentence of death against McVeigh are void and unenforceable. (Conclusion, fact/law)

26. Therefore, there is no authority to carry out any execution of McVeigh. Because there is no authority in an order or judgment from a court that lacks the authority to try the Cases, one primary concern behind this proceeding is that it is possible, as a matter of law, that such act amounts to another act of murder, and of destruction of evidence, of which we have had more than enough in this matter already. (Conclusion fact/law)

27. If McVeigh is a murderer, then let such charges be tried in a court that has the authority to try those Cases, namely the State District Court in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma.

Claim 2: The scheduled execution of Timothy McVeigh should be indefinitely postponed, because the death sentence judgment against McVeigh is void and unenforceable. The language used in the indictment on the "murder" charges is not "admissible evidence of Law" for any of the Cases charged against McVeigh. Alternatively, and in addition, to the foregoing,

28. Congress has no "legislative Power" to define and punish "murder" (which term here intends to cover any instrumentality by which is caused the death of another) as a matter of "admissible evidence of Law of the United States." (Conclusion Law)

29. While Congress does have "exclusive legislative Authority" to define and punish "murder," for purposes of "admissible evidence of Law of the District of Columbia," which is the Seat of the Government of the United States, the Murrah Federal Building was not in the District of Columbia.

(Fact Judicial Notice, Law)

30. While Congress does have "exclusive legislative Authority" to define and punish "murder," for purposes of "admissible evidence of Law" for matters that occur on property owned by United States Government, the Murrah Federal Building was not on property owned by the United States Government. (Fact Judicial Notice, Law)

A. There is no deed or receipt showing ownership in the United States Government, and no such document or evidence was ever introduced at trial. (Judicial Notice) B. There is no "Consent" by the Oklahoma State

Legislature to any such transfer into the hands of the United States Government, and no such document or evidence was ever introduced at trial. (Judicial Notice)

31. The "murder" charges in the indictment were based on language that is not Law of the United States. If that language is Law, it can only be Law of the District of Columbia. Outside that geographical limit, that language is "admissible evidence of Law" only for matters arising on, or somehow pertaining to, property owned by the United States Government. Since the Murrah Federal Building was not located on property owned by the United States government, the language of the indictment regarding these charges of "murder" cannot be the basis for any "murder" charge arising from the facts and circumstances of these Cases. (Any statutory language regarding "murder" can be provided only by the Oklahoma Legislature.) (Facts Judicial Notice, Law)

32. Since no language produced by the Oklahoma Legislature was the statutory basis for any "murder" charge against McVeigh, the indictment, as regards those particular charges, is void on its face. (Conclusion fact/law)

33. Since the "murder" charge language of the indictment does not assert a Case that arises under the Constitution, or under the Laws of the United States, or under any Treaty, and since such "murder" charge language does not assert a Case affecting any Ambassador, other public Minister or Consul, and since such "murder" charge language does not assert a Case of admiralty or maritime Jurisdiction, not only is the failure in that pleading not subject to waiver, but also such failure amounts to a failure to establish subject matter jurisdiction in any United States District Court regarding those "murder" charges. (Conclusion fact/law)

34. Since it is the "causing the death of another" language, in that or those statutory provisions, that led to the death penalty sentence, it follows that the order handing down that sentence, as regards the "murder" charges, is void and unenforceable. (Conclusion fact/law)

35. Therefore, there is no authority to carry out any execution of McVeigh, meaning that it is likely that such act amounts to nothing more than another act of murder, and another act of destruction of evidence, of which we have had more than enough in this matter already. (Conclusion fact/law)

36. If McVeigh is a murderer, then let such charges be brought by the Grand Jury of Oklahoma County, the one body in the entire country that has the authority to assert such "murder" charges, which charges, in this case, can be based only on Law of the State of Oklahoma, whether common law or legislative enactment, as the case may be.

Claim 3: The scheduled execution of Timothy McVeigh should be indefinitely postponed, because destroying McVeigh is another act of destruction of evidence. For so long as litigation exists, and there is still litigation pending as a result of the collapse of the Murrah Federal Building, both civil and criminal, McVeigh is a source of evidence, both as to what he knows and to his physical body. Alternatively, and in addition, to the foregoing,

37. Broadcast nationally through various news programs have been the comments both of McVeigh's psychiatrist and his former defense counsel. Specifically mentioned by the psychiatrist has been McVeigh's "consent" to the disclosure of that otherwise privileged information. Since McVeigh has communicated his willingness to provide evidence, what makes sense is to hear this information from him directly, rather than through his representatives. (Judicial Notice)

38. Even though litigation continues as a result of the collapse of the Murrah Federal Building, the building, itself, which is a vital source of evidence as to what took place that morning, was razed. (Judicial Notice)

39. Even though litigation continues, one key party to a particularly relevant set of events and circumstances, namely McVeigh, is scheduled to be destroyed. (Judicial Notice)

40. Even though litigation continues, one key item of evidence, namely

 he physical body of McVeigh, itself, is scheduled to be destroyed.

(Judicial Notice)

41. Since the judicial proceedings to date have done far more to raise questions than to answer them, to raise doubts than to dispel them, it follows that all who have interests in the currently pending litigation, and in any timely initiated litigation that may follow, should be allowed the fullest accessibility to every possible remaining shred of evidence, even that of the living, physical body of McVeigh, and of the information McVeigh himself has, as regards all elements and facets of these extraordinary circumstances. (Conclusion fact/law)

42. Since such matters are still in the trial stage, potentially subject to retrial, until there is no possible additional proceeding for which evidence that McVeigh can provide is pending, McVeigh must be preserved as evidence. (Judicial Notice, Conclusion fact/law)

43. Many properly convicted murderers spend a great many years on "death row." Thus, there seems an unusual hurry to execute McVeigh, especially in light of the lack of subject matter jurisdiction to impose the sentence of death, both as to the trial court, generally, and as to the "murder" charges, specifically. (Judicial Notice) Prayer for Relief Wherefore, premises considered, Plaintiffs request that the court grant the following relief:

1. Issue a temporary injunction, upon hearing or ex parte, as the circumstances may initially require, effectively staying the execution of Timothy McVeigh.

2. Grant a permanent injunction, upon notice and opportunity to be heard, to stay the execution of Timothy McVeigh.

3. Grant any and all other relief to which Plaintiffs may show themselves justly entitled.

Respectfully submitted, Harmon L. Taylor Texas State Bar No.

19693800 Lawyer and Counselor P.O. Box 516104 Dallas, Texas 75251

Telephone: (214) 361-0401

Facsimile: (214) 361-0306 Lawyer for Plaintiffs 3

sent to-365532-6613-989351528

Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 14:15:08 -0500 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

AND

APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Signed and sworn to on this the 10th day of May, 2001.

Jane Graham, Affiant

Notary Public

(Seal or Stamp)

My Commission Expires:

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On this the 10th day of May, 2001, I certify that I have served upon the following parties, by process server, the foregoing Affidavit of Jane Graham:

Warden Lappin Attorney General Carter

United States Penitentiary Indiana Government Center South, 5th Floor

4200 Bureau Rd N 402 West Washington Street

Terre Haute, Indiana 47808 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

Harmon L. Taylor

Additionally, Mr. Taylor, Mrs. Graham's attorney makes the following statement:

Original Message -----

From: LegalReality

Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:51 AM

Subject: Serious case, short time

Good Morning:

I'm Harmon L. Taylor, and I'm licensed in Texas (SBN 19693800), since

May, 1989. Your name came up as someone in Terre Haute who might be able to get me in touch with at least one lawyer there who would be able to serve as local counsel.

Let me apologize up front for what may be a close shave on the practical time line. I've been following the McVeigh case since fairly early on, and there are a couple of major problems stemming from lack of judicial authority to try the case at all, and I'd like to get those heard in the court there in the county in which the correctional facility is located. McVeigh, as a person, is about the last concern on my list. What gets my attention here is the cost it has taken to obtain and preserve our notions of "limited government." If it helps at all, my grandfather (Mom's Dad), served in the Navy in WWI; I went to Texas A&M; I've got family and friends on active duty and on reserve duty, and it can't stand it when they get, let's just call it "the epitome of disrespect," when what they're ready to protect is just willy-nilly given away in the courtroom.

In March, I wrote the President a letter. The full text is on the website

What I had depended upon, perhaps too optimistically, was a contact into your area in order to get some planning done considerably earlier than "now." There having been none until yesterday, I can just allow this to play out and see what the Divine Intervention result will be. And, your name came up from the pro-life matters, so I doubt you'd even know from whom came the reference.

At any rate, in the Open Letter to the President, I outline two reasons to stay the execution. Actually, both points would change the current result drastically, but the primary objective is to prevent the execution. I don't know; we may have different views on the death penalty, but even where I would otherwise find it the appropriate sentence, I'd like first for the court to have at least the authority to try the case.

Point 1: No court (State or US) in Colorado has subject matter jurisdiction to try a criminal case that arose outside Colorado, in this case, Oklahoma.

Article III, section 2, Article 4, section 2, and the Sixth Amendment are abundantly clear that even Treason, the one crime defined in the Constitution, itself, cannot be tried outside the State in which it arose. So, there's no legislatively defined/punished behavior (State or US) that can ever be "transferred" across the State line. In other words, even if the language used for purposes of the indictment were "Law of the United States," it's still legally impossible for a crime in Oklahoma to be tried in Colorado. Not even Treason committed in Oklahoma could be tried in Colorado.

Point 2: (In sum) The indictment is insufficient on its face, as regards the charges of murder. Congress has zero authority to address the topic of murder (and, in this area, we might be able to get a better handle on what the feds are trying to do as regards abortion). Since Congress can't address murder in such a way as to create "Law of the United States," what we're left with is either a military matter or a matter involving United States property.

Two key problems here. (1) The McVeigh case is neither a military matter nor a matter involving United States property, and (2) even if this involved United States property, such legislation is not a basis for activating Article III, section 2, subject matter jurisdiction.

As regards the first key problem. The non-military angle may speak for itself, so I'll address the summary as to how we know this wasn't a matter involving United States property. For property to be United States property, there must be, among the other requirements, two documents:

(1) A deed (some form of receipt) and (2) an Act by the State Legislature granting "Consent" to the sale of that property to the United States Government. Art. I, section 8 (in the "exclusive legislative Authority" clause).

The local media, there in OK City, ran a few stories really early on into this matter that established that no such documents exists. That story didn't get national attention, and I only learned about it after proposing this angle to some folks there in OK City. At any rate, after contacting the State Legislature myself, and getting no response, and being satisfied that it's impossible for such documents to be in the original trial record, since the documents don't exist, I'm 100% certain that we're not talking about US Government Property: (1) There is no deed (receipt), and (2) the Oklahoma Legislature never consented to any transfer into the hands of the United States Government.

Therefore, this is not even a matter that involves US Government property, which leaves both the US Grand Jury and the US Attorney General's Office in the reality of having no authority in/over the case.

As regards the second key problem (regarding the basis for the murder charges). Let's say that the AG's Office comes up with some fraudulently filed and authenticated documents that would then satisfy the requirements that this property was US Government property. It's still the case than any language that would apply to the District (and all US Government property) would HAVE to be handled by the STATE authorities. Since Article III, section 2, does not extend the judicial

Power to matters that "arise under" the Law of the District (which is made by Congress pursuant to the "exclusive legislative Authority" clause in Article I, section 8), it follows that there just simply is no basis for trying such crimes in any US District Court in the country, much less even presenting them to a US Grand Jury, or having them handled by the US AG's Office. But, to focus on the essential point, there's zero authority in any US District Court, not even one in Oklahoma, to try a criminal charge based on language that is only applicable to/in the District (and to US Government property). Those matters MUST be sued out in the State judicial process.

That's the legal basis for asking for a stay of execution. Not to get into the "this is splitting hairs" angle, I'm also 100% convinced that the truck bomb, the only explosion to which McVeigh has been associated, was anything like sufficient to bring down that building. As indicated in the letter to the President, the facts we know to be true, which have yet to make the national media, include the fact that each one of the vertical supports in that building had a demolition charge strapped to it (which the FBI, ATF, etc., knew about, which is why they weren't there that day). The tireless work that (former) Oklahoma State Representative Charles Key and his team have done puts this, and many unreported facts rather much beyond dispute.

In short, on the issue of causation, we have this. This is not an explosion case, as has been marketed by the media. It's a building collapse case. Those very unfortunate deaths were not caused by the explosion, but by the building collapse. So, the question is this: which explosion(s) that morning caused the building to collapse? Given that it was physically impossible for the truck bomb to do much more than break some windows, it follows that there's an intervening cause, and superseding cause, which other cause is the actual cause of the building collapse.

Thus, it's impossible for McVeigh's actions to have resulted in the building collapse, meaning it's legally impossible for McVeigh to have committed murder, at all. That's the matter in a nutshell. Please feel free to forward this to any who might be able to serve as local counsel.

Thanks, very much, for having a minute, and for your time in this matter.

Harmon L. Taylor

Editor

Legal Reality

(214) 361-0401

Jane Graham's letter to the Oklahoma County Grand Jury dated

November 24, 1997:

This is what they call obstruction of justice and lying - a lapse? Oh, good.

And they wonder why thinking Americans do not trust this government or their goon agencies? A very important point here about this "sudden discovery": Once again the government has put the situation back into an arena they can control: a federal court matter. Same judge, same players, outcome controlled.

These documents are potentially nothing. Isn't that what we keep hearing from the feds? They're gonna give up a few documents that are "nothing."

Fat chance.

http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/fbilab1/fbil1toc.htm      (just a note from the owners of this site: this link is now broken. Wonder why....)

Excerpt:

"From the report: "As explained below, we conclude that in this report, Williams repeatedly reached conclusions that incriminated the defendants without a scientific basis and that were not explained in the body of the report. We find fault with other aspects of the report as well. We also conclude that Thurman performed an inadequate review of Williams' report by allowing Williams too much discretion and by approving conclusions with which Thurman disagreed and could not support.

Further, we conclude that Martz improperly deviated from the explosives residue protocol in his examination of some specimens."

"Williams testified at his OIG interview that determining (scientific stuff deleted).....Williams also acknowledged that although ammonium nitrate crystals were found at the post-blast scene, there are many explosives t\in the range of 12,14000 fps that have ammonium nitrate in them.

Nevertheless, Williams concluded in his report that the main explosive used at OKC was ANFO. He acknowledged that he reached this conclusion, in part, because Terry Nichols, one of the defendants in this case, purchased ammonium nitrate and diesel oil prior to the bombing.

Without the evidence of these purchases, Williams admitted he would have been unable to conclude that ANFO was used. Indeed, Williams stated that based on the post-blast scene along, it could have been dynamite."

Mrs. Graham talks about a man named Gary Hunt and his possible involvement. But, Larry Becraft says he saw Gary Hunt in Orlando, Florida the same day. I personally spoke with Charles Key about Hunt. If you don't know who Charles Key is, please go to:

http://www.okcbombing.org/about_us.htm

For those who have studied the Kennedy assassination, there were too many Lee Harvey Oswalds running around, at least 8 of them. There is a web site that has an interesting photo comparison gallery that is worth looking at:

http://www.jfkresearch.com/lho2.htm

I think many people feel McVeigh is an enigma. I've already covered this in my last piece. There are many similarities between McVeigh and Lee Harvey Oswald:

Both were in the military:

The American people saw the same images of both these guys, over andover and over until one would think they were the only pictures ever taken of these two.

How about these photos of McVeigh and three ATF agents?

These two guys could be twins. One is an ATF agent in the court room during the Waco trial. The other is the famous one seen of McVeigh while being transferred from Perry, OK to a federal jail.

I would give a lot to see the video from the court room when this picture was taken....

Multiple Bombs

http://www.journalrecord.com/05-19-95a.htm

http://www.journalrecord.com/05-19-95a.htm

Wednesday, April 19, 1995

Emergency Personnel Respond Quickly To Crisis

By Kirby Lee Davis

Assistant Managing Editor

"In an unnatural cloud of relief, and disbelief, I left to find

people fleeing north. Another bomb had been found. I

wondered then what I would do, stranded in what I

considered a dangerous part of town, but even then the Lord

was watching over me. "

If you don't want to believe me, how about government documents? The official documents on the web site below will literally blow your mind. I had not seen these documents before, but they fit with all the eyewitness accounts and live news coverage as the story unfolded:

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/ok.html

How about the Oklahoma City Fire Department's claim that there was another bomb(s)?

The Secondary Device

"10:30 a.m. The radio crackles, "Everybody out of the building". Fire fighters scurry down the ladder which has been utilized to reach and remove the injured. You move away from the building to the northeast. Firefighters stand by their pumper, eager to return to the rescue efforts. The aerial ladders sit in front of the building, void of personnel."

You can hear the fire personnel on audio telling their crews to get out of the building because of a secondary device:

http://www.fireprograms.okstate.edu/OCFD/htm/photo0_1.htm

Are they all a bunch of right-wing wackos, too? Let me tell you people:

More:

http://www.emergency.com/oklabomb.htm

" A secondary device was also reportedly found inside the building, believed placed there with a time delay fuse to kill rescuers, after they had arrived on the scene. Unconfirmed reports were also received of a third device. The secondary device was reported disarmed at the scene.

Further details regarding the actual configuration of the devices is being withheld by federal officials as the investigation continues."

Also from the OKC Fire Department:

http://www.fireprograms.okstate.edu/OCFD/htm/photo0_2.htm

"After the "bomb" is removed, rescue operations resume. Approaching from the east, you see the damaged building and the street full of debris. As you get closer you observe a heavily damaged car next to the large pile of debris in front of the Murrah Building."

Car bomb or truck bomb?

"At day's end Wednesday, authorities confirmed that at least 31 people had been killed in the car bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, the worst U.S. bomb attack measured by death toll in 75 years.

"The blast was so powerful that it rocked the ground 40 miles away."

"It sent shrapnel-like shards of glass, steel and concrete rocketing for four blocks around the federal building and blasted windows out of structures hundreds of yards from the site of the explosion, which was marked by an 8-foot-deep crater in an adjacent parking lot."

The government and it's media have maintained from day one that the "big, yellow Ryder truck" left a crater in front of the building 8' x 30'.

But, what do I know? I don't work for the feds so my common sense thinking doesn't apply.

After the bombing, the feds were able to piece together a Ryder truck based on the VIN numbers on an axle found two blocks from the crime scene that leaped tall buildings. During McVeigh's trial, the axle is now found in a more believeable location. Sure, and I'm fluent in 16 languages.

Here's another gem from that piece:

"In the absence of a claim of responsibility for the blast, the day was full of speculation."

"Then a routine check of his [McVeigh's] social security number matched one flagged by the FBI as belonging to a suspect in the bombing."

This story came out on the 22nd but was written on the 21st. McVeigh was picked up by OK State Trooper Charlie Hanger on the morning of April 19th. On the morning of April 21st, the boys in Perry, OK are notified that they have in their custody a suspect from the OKC bombing.

I think we can assume that McVeigh's social security number was put out on the NCIC and other law enforcement alerts and bingo! Up pops their boy, safe and contained in a po-dunk jail. How very convenient.

"Mainstream media" putting their spin on the multiple-bombing

"conspiracy theory":

http://webusers.anet-stl.com/~civil/govliesoklahomacity.html

Statement from survivor:

http://www.journalrecord.com/05-19-95b.htm

"After a few minutes we got through to our families, but were unsuccessful in our attempt to reach David's wife. I was shocked to hear that my aunt had heard and felt the blast 50 miles away."

A car bomb that kicked a blast so powerful it was felt 50 miles away? I don't think so.

Still a car bomb:

http://www.fireprograms.okstate.edu/OCFD/htm/photo0.htm

I would like you to look at the picture below very carefully. This is the best photo of the crime scene I have. A big color picture of the truth.

Now, you can see that the parking lot of the Southwest Bell Building has lots of vehicles on fire. It looks as if a bomb went off there. At the same time, the Murrah Building is blown from the inside out, see:

Click here for HUGE image <images/graham-photo5a_lg.jpgor click the picture for a medium size image.

http://www.fireprograms.okstate.edu/OCFD/htm/implode.htm

Look at the photo.

The photo below tells it all regarding the alleged crater in front of the building:

The government contends that this car/truck bomb took out the front of the Murrah Building from a distance of some 50'. Now I want you to look at the two photos below. This is ground zero of the World Trade Center bombing:

An incredible piece of video is available (I hope CNN doesn't remove it before you get to see it) that must have been shot within minutes of the bombing. Look at this video. The major fire is from the bombed out area of the Southwest Bell parking lot. Then look at the Murrah Building and where the smoke is coming from--just like the implosion photos - from inside the building:

The web site below has some of the best photos of the crime scene and I encourage you to please hit on it. Look at each photo in the enlarged version and also the audio if you can. These photos are incredible and reinforce my earlier statements about what those on the scene must have gone through and the courage by so many in trying to reach the injured:

I have the November 1996 issue sitting in front of me, let me quote:

"Despite only one known case (ANFO bombing) in almost 25 years, did Clinton's National Security Council actually anticipate a need for detailed information regarding ANFO vehicle bomb attacks a few months before the OKC blast?......In fact, a brief summary of Project Dipole Might is featured in ATF's 10994 Annual Report to Congress. It reads: Dipole Might is the name given to a research project ATF is working on in conjunction with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Defense Nuclear Agency. The objective of this three year project, funded by the NSC in 1993, is to create a computerized data base and investigative protocol for the investigation of large scale vehicle bombs.....The tests for this project were conceived using four of the most common roadbed types in the United States and explosive charges that varied in size from 50 pounds to 1,000 pound and type from C4 to ANFO (C4 to represent the effect of plastic explosives and ANFO for its common availability and use in terrorist devices)."

But, why? What do middle Eastern terrorists crawling around in country who bombed the World Trade Center have to do with the OKC bombing?

What about all the initial reports of middle Eastern looking types right after the OKC bombing? Anything in common? Only one:

http://www.boogieonline.com/revolution/multi/terrorism/wtc.html

http://www.sfgate.com/cgibin/

Ashcroft's office or an honest judge could fix that in a NY second.

What about Andrew Strassmeir? The FBI and a guy named Kirk Lyons (strange bedfellows playing together), assisted getting this key player out of the country. John Ashcroft should use all the power of his office to extradite this guy back to the United States - today.

Media Bypass - 1-800-4bypass

The New American 414-749-3784

worldnetdaily.com picked up the ball on the bombing and they have a full archive of material now:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=22930

Thanks to Joe Farah and his entire staff for their coverage.